1989 Ford Tempo vs. 1995 Kia Capital
To start off, 1995 Kia Capital is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Kia Capital (114 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1989 Ford Tempo. (96 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Kia Capital should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Kia Capital weights approximately 175 kg more than 1989 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Ford Tempo (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Kia Capital. (153 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1989 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Kia Capital.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Tempo | 1995 Kia Capital | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Tempo | Capital |
Year Released | 1989 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2530 mm |