1989 Ford Tempo vs. 2002 Lada 2123
To start off, 2002 Lada 2123 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ford Tempo (96 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2002 Lada 2123. (76 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada 2123. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lada 2123 weights approximately 175 kg more than 1989 Ford Tempo.
Because 2002 Lada 2123 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lada 2123 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Ford Tempo (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lada 2123. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1989 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lada 2123.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Tempo | 2002 Lada 2123 | |
Make | Ford | Lada |
Model | Tempo | 2123 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1688 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2460 mm |