1989 Ford Tempo vs. 2005 Noble M14
To start off, 2005 Noble M14 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Noble M14 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Noble M14 (395 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 299 more horse power than 1989 Ford Tempo. (96 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Noble M14 should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Tempo.
Because 2005 Noble M14 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Noble M14. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Noble M14 (522 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 347 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2005 Noble M14 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Ford Tempo | 2005 Noble M14 | |
| Make | Ford | Noble |
| Model | Tempo | M14 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 395 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1160 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2440 mm |
