1989 Ford Tempo vs. 2008 Skoda Roomster
To start off, 2008 Skoda Roomster is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ford Tempo (96 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2008 Skoda Roomster. (79 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2008 Skoda Roomster. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Skoda Roomster weights approximately 170 kg more than 1989 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Skoda Roomster (195 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Skoda Roomster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Tempo | 2008 Skoda Roomster | |
Make | Ford | Skoda |
Model | Tempo | Roomster |
Year Released | 1989 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1422 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 19.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2620 mm |