1989 Ford Tempo vs. 2010 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2010 Nissan Titan is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 5,549 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1989 Ford Tempo. (96 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Tempo.
Because 2010 Nissan Titan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Nissan Titan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Titan (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 347 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Tempo | 2010 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Tempo | Titan |
Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 5549 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3560 mm |