1989 Ford Tempo vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 264 more horse power than 1989 Ford Tempo. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Tempo.
Because 2012 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Tempo | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Tempo | Commodore |
Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 175 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |