1989 Ford Tempo vs. 2012 Mazda 6
To start off, 2012 Mazda 6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 6 (153 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1989 Ford Tempo. (96 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 6 weights approximately 285 kg more than 1989 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 6 (193 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Tempo | 2012 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Tempo | 6 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 193 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1795 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2789 mm |