1989 Ford Tempo vs. 2013 Honda Crosstour
To start off, 2013 Honda Crosstour is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,354 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Honda Crosstour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda Crosstour (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1989 Ford Tempo. (96 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda Crosstour should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Honda Crosstour weights approximately 605 kg more than 1989 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Tempo | 2013 Honda Crosstour | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Tempo | Crosstour |
Year Released | 1989 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0 : 1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1755 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4999 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1898 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2797 mm |