1989 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 1989 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ford Thunderbird (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 599 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1989 Ford Thunderbird (291 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1989 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Thunderbird | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Thunderbird | 220 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 291 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 45 L |