1989 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2005 Smart Coupe
To start off, 2005 Smart Coupe is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ford Thunderbird (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2005 Smart Coupe. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2005 Smart Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 884 kg more than 2005 Smart Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1989 Ford Thunderbird (291 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Smart Coupe. (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1989 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Smart Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Ford Thunderbird | 2005 Smart Coupe | |
| Make | Ford | Smart |
| Model | Thunderbird | Coupe |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 291 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 730 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 1820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 33 L |
