1989 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 163 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30.
Because 1989 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Thunderbird | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Thunderbird | C30 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |