1989 Holden Apollo vs. 1955 Humber Super Snipe
To start off, 1989 Holden Apollo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1955 Humber Super Snipe. (114 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 1955 Humber Super Snipe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 685 kg more than 1989 Holden Apollo.
Because 1955 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Holden Apollo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Holden Apollo | 1955 Humber Super Snipe | |
Make | Holden | Humber |
Model | Apollo | Super Snipe |
Year Released | 1989 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4138 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 5050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2950 mm |