1989 Holden Barina vs. 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 1989 Holden Barina is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1989 Holden Barina. (67 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1989 Holden Barina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 770 kg more than 1989 Holden Barina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Holden Barina | 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | Holden | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Barina | 6C |
Year Released | 1989 | 1938 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1324 cc | 2442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 3010 mm |