1989 Holden Camira vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1989 Holden Camira is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Holden Camira is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Holden Camira (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Holden Camira should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Holden Camira weights approximately 108 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1989 Holden Camira (176 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1989 Holden Camira will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Holden Camira | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | Camira | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 942 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2210 mm |
