1989 Holden Camira vs. 2006 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2006 Nissan Navara is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Holden Camira would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Navara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Navara (265 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1989 Holden Camira. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Navara should accelerate faster than 1989 Holden Camira.
Because 2006 Nissan Navara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Nissan Navara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Navara (386 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Holden Camira. (176 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Navara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Holden Camira | 2006 Nissan Navara | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | Camira | Navara |
Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 386 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3210 mm |