1989 Holden Commodore vs. 1985 Vauxhall Nova

To start off, 1989 Holden Commodore is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Vauxhall Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Vauxhall Nova would be higher. At 4,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 1989 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Vauxhall Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Holden Commodore (522 Nm) has 453 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Vauxhall Nova. (69 Nm). This means 1989 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Vauxhall Nova.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Holden Commodore 1985 Vauxhall Nova
Make Holden Vauxhall
Model Commodore Nova
Year Released 1989 1985
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4980 cc 993 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 44 HP
Torque 522 Nm 69 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]