1989 Holden Gemini vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 1,471 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Holden Gemini is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Smart ForTwo (83 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1989 Holden Gemini. (72 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1989 Holden Gemini.
Because 2009 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Holden Gemini, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Smart ForTwo (121 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Holden Gemini. (117 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Smart ForTwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Holden Gemini | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Holden | Smart |
Model | Gemini | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1989 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1471 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 117 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 2700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 1870 mm |