1989 Holden Nova vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1989 Holden Nova is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1989 Holden Nova. (90 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1989 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 120 kg more than 1989 Holden Nova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Holden Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Holden Nova | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Holden | Sunbeam |
| Model | Nova | Tiger |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 4259 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2190 mm |
