1989 Holden Nova vs. 2008 Skoda Roomster
To start off, 2008 Skoda Roomster is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,422 cc (3 cylinders), 2008 Skoda Roomster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Holden Nova (81 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2008 Skoda Roomster. (50 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 2008 Skoda Roomster. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Skoda Roomster weights approximately 295 kg more than 1989 Holden Nova.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Skoda Roomster (155 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Holden Nova. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Skoda Roomster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Holden Nova | 2008 Skoda Roomster | |
| Make | Holden | Skoda |
| Model | Nova | Roomster |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1397 cc | 1422 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 50 HP |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2620 mm |
