1989 Holden Nova vs. 2012 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2012 Subaru Outback is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Holden Nova would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Subaru Outback (170 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1989 Holden Nova. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1989 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Subaru Outback weights approximately 602 kg more than 1989 Holden Nova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Subaru Outback is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Holden Nova. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Subaru Outback (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Holden Nova. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Holden Nova | 2012 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Holden | Subaru |
Model | Nova | Outback |
Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1617 kg |