1989 Honda Civic vs. 1968 Rover 2000
To start off, 1989 Honda Civic is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Rover 2000 (142 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1989 Honda Civic. (90 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 1989 Honda Civic.
Because 1968 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Rover 2000 (272 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Honda Civic. (114 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1968 Rover 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Honda Civic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Honda Civic | 1968 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Honda | Rover |
Model | Civic | 2000 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 3532 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 114 Nm | 272 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |