1989 Honda Civic vs. 1980 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1989 Honda Civic is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Honda Civic (90 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 1300.
Because 1980 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Honda Civic (114 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1989 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Honda Civic | 1980 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Honda | Zastava |
| Model | Civic | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 114 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
