1989 Jaguar XJR vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,996 cc (12 cylinders), 1989 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Jaguar XJR (318 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (108 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 695 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1989 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Jaguar XJR (476 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 328 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1989 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio. 1989 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 2005 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2005 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Jaguar XJR | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | XJR | Clio |
Year Released | 1989 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5996 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 318 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 476 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.5 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7 seconds | 9.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 91 L | 50 L |