1989 Jaguar XJS vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1989 Jaguar XJS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jaguar XJS weights approximately 270 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Jaguar XJS | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
Model | XJS | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1989 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3980 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2760 mm |