1989 Jaguar XJS vs. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1989 Jaguar XJS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1989 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jaguar XJS weights approximately 604 kg more than 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1989 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Jaguar XJS | 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
Model | XJS | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1989 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5343 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 291 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2680 mm |