1989 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1996 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 548 kg more than 1989 Jeep Wrangler.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Jeep Wrangler | 1996 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Jeep | Land Rover |
Model | Wrangler | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1989 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 3946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 188 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 2090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2750 mm |