1989 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 442 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Because 1989 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda RX-01. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Jeep Wrangler | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | Wrangler | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 4228 cc | 2615 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2350 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 55 L |
