1989 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1997 Suzuki C2
To start off, 1997 Suzuki C2 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 694 kg more than 1997 Suzuki C2.
Because 1989 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Suzuki C2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Jeep Wrangler | 1997 Suzuki C2 | |
| Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
| Model | Wrangler | C2 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 4228 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 251 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 848 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2240 mm |
