1989 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz A
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz A is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 347 kg more than 2002 Mercedes-Benz A.
Because 1989 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mercedes-Benz A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mercedes-Benz A has automatic transmission and 1989 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 1989 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mercedes-Benz A will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Jeep Wrangler | 2002 Mercedes-Benz A | |
| Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Wrangler | A |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 4228 cc | 2084 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2780 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 54 L |
