1989 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Jeep Wrangler | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Jeep | Ford |
| Model | Wrangler | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2003 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 4228 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2490 mm |
