1989 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 702 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Jeep Wrangler | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Jeep | Subaru |
Model | Wrangler | R2 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 45 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 30 L |