1989 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 898 kg more than 1989 Jeep Wrangler.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Jeep Wrangler | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Jeep | Land Rover |
Model | Wrangler | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1989 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 283 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 2440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 100 L |