1989 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 72 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1989 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Jeep Wrangler | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | Wrangler | 6 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 4228 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 64 L |
