1989 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 72 kg more than 2010 Suzuki Kizashi.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Jeep Wrangler | 2010 Suzuki Kizashi | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Wrangler | Kizashi |
Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4651 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 63 L |