1989 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 242 kg more than 2010 Toyota Matrix.
Because 1989 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Jeep Wrangler | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Jeep | Toyota |
Model | Wrangler | Matrix |
Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 132 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 50 L |