1989 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 156 kg more than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Because 1989 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Lotus Evora. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Jeep Wrangler | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Jeep | Lotus |
| Model | Wrangler | Evora |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 276 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 1386 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2047 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1229 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2575 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 60 L |
