1989 Lada Samara vs. 2004 Mazda 3
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Lada Samara would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (144 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1989 Lada Samara. (64 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1989 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 303 kg more than 1989 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 3 (184 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Lada Samara. (98 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Lada Samara.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Lada Samara | 2004 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Samara | 3 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1288 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 144 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 98 Nm | 184 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1223 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2760 mm |