1989 Lada Samara vs. 2005 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Lada Samara would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1989 Lada Samara. (64 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1989 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 365 kg more than 1989 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Lada Samara. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Lada Samara.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Lada Samara | 2005 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Lada | Nissan |
Model | Samara | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1989 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1288 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 98 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2540 mm |