1989 Lancia Y10 vs. 2002 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2002 Mercury Cougar is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Lancia Y10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Lancia Y10 would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercury Cougar (123 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1989 Lancia Y10. (56 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1989 Lancia Y10. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 494 kg more than 1989 Lancia Y10. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercury Cougar (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Lancia Y10. (88 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Lancia Y10.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Lancia Y10 | 2002 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Lancia | Mercury |
Model | Y10 | Cougar |
Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 88 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3380 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2710 mm |