1989 Lotus Carlton vs. 1960 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1989 Lotus Carlton is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 3,615 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Lotus Carlton is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Lotus Carlton (569 Nm) has 547 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm). This means 1989 Lotus Carlton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Lotus Carlton | 1960 Mazda R 360 | |
| Make | Lotus | Mazda |
| Model | Carlton | R 360 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1960 |
| Engine Size | 3615 cc | 356 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 16 HP |
| Torque | 569 Nm | 22 Nm |
| Top Speed | 289 km/hour | 89 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 2990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 1770 mm |
