1989 Lotus Carlton vs. 1965 Mini MK I
To start off, 1989 Lotus Carlton is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mini MK I would be higher. At 3,615 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Lotus Carlton is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Lotus Carlton is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Lotus Carlton. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Lotus Carlton (569 Nm) has 509 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mini MK I. (60 Nm). This means 1989 Lotus Carlton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Lotus Carlton | 1965 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Lotus | Mini |
| Model | Carlton | MK I |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3615 cc | 846 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
| Torque | 569 Nm | 60 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2040 mm |
