1989 Lotus Carlton vs. 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Lotus Carlton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Lotus Carlton would be higher. At 3,963 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Lotus Carlton. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Lotus Carlton (569 Nm) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (305 Nm). This means 1989 Lotus Carlton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee. 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1989 Lotus Carlton has manual transmission. 1989 Lotus Carlton will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Lotus Carlton | 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Lotus | Jeep |
| Model | Carlton | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3615 cc | 3963 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 569 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Top Speed | 289 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2700 mm |
