1989 Lotus Carlton vs. 1995 Mazda 626
To start off, 1995 Mazda 626 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Lotus Carlton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Lotus Carlton would be higher. At 3,615 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Lotus Carlton is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Lotus Carlton is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Lotus Carlton. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Lotus Carlton (569 Nm) has 352 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (217 Nm). This means 1989 Lotus Carlton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Lotus Carlton | 1995 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Lotus | Mazda |
Model | Carlton | 626 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3615 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 569 Nm | 217 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2620 mm |