1989 Lotus Carlton vs. 1996 Alfa Romeo 146
To start off, 1996 Alfa Romeo 146 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Lotus Carlton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Lotus Carlton would be higher. At 3,615 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Lotus Carlton is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Lotus Carlton is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Lotus Carlton. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Alfa Romeo 146, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Lotus Carlton (569 Nm) has 454 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Alfa Romeo 146. (115 Nm). This means 1989 Lotus Carlton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Alfa Romeo 146.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Lotus Carlton | 1996 Alfa Romeo 146 | |
Make | Lotus | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Carlton | 146 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3615 cc | 1351 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 90 HP |
Torque | 569 Nm | 115 Nm |
Top Speed | 289 km/hour | 179 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2550 mm |