1989 Lotus Carlton vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Lotus Carlton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Lotus Carlton would be higher. At 3,615 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Lotus Carlton is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Lotus Carlton. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Lotus Carlton (569 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Volvo XC90. (380 Nm). This means 1989 Lotus Carlton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Volvo XC90. 2002 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 1989 Lotus Carlton has manual transmission. 1989 Lotus Carlton will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Lotus Carlton | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Lotus | Volvo |
| Model | Carlton | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3615 cc | 2922 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
| Torque | 569 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Top Speed | 289 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2720 mm |
