1989 Lotus Carlton vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Lotus Carlton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Lotus Carlton would be higher. At 3,615 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Lotus Carlton is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Lotus Carlton is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Lotus Carlton. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Lotus Carlton (569 Nm) has 424 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (145 Nm). This means 1989 Lotus Carlton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Lotus Carlton | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Lotus | Mazda |
| Model | Carlton | 3 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3615 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
| Torque | 569 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Top Speed | 289 km/hour | 177 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2650 mm |
