1989 Lotus Carlton vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Lotus Carlton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Lotus Carlton would be higher. At 3,615 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Lotus Carlton is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Lotus Carlton is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Lotus Carlton. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Lotus Carlton (569 Nm) has 464 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm). This means 1989 Lotus Carlton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Lotus Carlton | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lotus | Renault |
Model | Carlton | Clio |
Year Released | 1989 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3615 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 569 Nm | 105 Nm |
Top Speed | 289 km/hour | 167 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2580 mm |