1989 Lotus Carlton vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Lotus Carlton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Lotus Carlton would be higher. At 3,615 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Lotus Carlton is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Volvo XC90 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Lotus Carlton. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Lotus Carlton (569 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volvo XC90. (420 Nm). This means 1989 Lotus Carlton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Lotus Carlton | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Lotus | Volvo |
| Model | Carlton | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3615 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
| Torque | 569 Nm | 420 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4808 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1897 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1783 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2860 mm |
