1989 Lotus Carlton vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Lotus Carlton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Lotus Carlton would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Lotus Carlton. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (630 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Lotus Carlton. (569 Nm). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Lotus Carlton. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1989 Lotus Carlton has manual transmission. 1989 Lotus Carlton will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Lotus Carlton | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Lotus | Jeep |
Model | Carlton | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1989 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3615 cc | 6400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 459 HP |
Torque | 569 Nm | 630 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2156 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2916 mm |