1989 Lotus Elan vs. 2006 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (260 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1989 Lotus Elan. (165 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1989 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 235 kg more than 1989 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (415 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Lotus Elan. (201 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Lotus Elan | 2006 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Lotus | Toyota |
Model | Elan | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 201 Nm | 415 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 87 L |